Pages

Monday, November 12, 2012

What is your time worth?

CBS News:
LAURA VANDERKAM / MONEYWATCH/ November 9, 2012, 7:01 AM

(MoneyWatch) If a colleague dropped by your desk every day and asked you for $20, you probably wouldn't keep giving it to her. Yet many folks burn through 20 minutes waiting for tardy colleagues to start meetings, listening to stories that go on tangents, and responding to emails that never needed to be sent in the first place.
Why do we do that?
"We give away our time much, much, much easier than we give away our dollars," says Carson Tate, owner of Working Simply, a management consulting company that focuses on workplace productivity. "Until we quantify and make time as tangible as possible, like dollars in our pockets, it's really hard to make investment decisions." Indeed, time is often more scarce than money. ...We need to think about time "as a precious commodity we can't ever get back," says Tate. Here is her 3-step strategy for being better stewards of this resource.
1. Look at your investment statement. "Your calendar is your investment statement," says Tate. ... Look at where your time goes. How much time did you invest in doing those things you were hired to do? How much time did you invest in doing supporting tasks that help you stay close to the revenue line? And -- be honest -- how much time did you spend on completely unrelated activities?
2. Track your time. ... Now it's time to go deep in the weeds. Try keeping a time log for a few days, or a week if you can(that link goes to a spreadsheet you can get from my personal website, but you can also just use a regular Excel file or Word document, or a time-tracking app if you like). You'll start to see patterns -- when you have more energy, and when you're easily distracted. You can use this information to plan when to invest certain hours in certain projects to get the best payoff.
3. Align your time and goals. Think of your professional aspirations and the goals of your company. What do you want to do this week, this month, this year? At the end of the month, look at how you've spent your time, and if these investments paid off in your reaching your goals. ... If not, "What are you going to do differently?" asks Tate. ... Look at what has a payoff -- and put your time there.








  • Easily add time tracking to any app




  • Introducing Paydirt - Time Tracking and Invoicing for Web Based Professionals


  • Enhanced by Zemanta

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

    A Flare for Risk

     "A severe solar storm can cripple electrical grids, wreak havoc on our economy and cause trillions of dollars in damage and supply chain interruptions. Think it can't happen? It did in 1859, and in just the last five years, the Earth has been dangerously close to being hit with solar flares. "

    Risk & Insurance Online
    October 15, 2012
    By Kyle Beatty and Nicole L. Homeier


    "Never say never" is a well-known axiom ... but it applies perhaps most dramatically to the potential for catastrophic weather events. Although infrequent, they do happen -- at times with devastating results.


    IN SPACE - JANUARY 23:  In this handout from t...
    IN SPACE - JANUARY 23: In this handout from the NOAA/National Weather Service's Space Weather Prediction Center, shows a solar flare erupting from the sun late January 23, 2012. The flare is reportedly the largest since 2005 and is expected to affect GPS systems and other communications when it reaches the Earth's magnetic field in the morning of January 24. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)

    The most severe space weather event in recorded history -- known as the Carrington Event -- took place in 1859. The largest geomagnetic storm on record, it electrified transmission cables, set fires in telegraph offices, and produced Northern Lights so bright that people could read newspapers by the glow. If a similar storm occurred today, according to a report by the National Academy of Sciences, it could cause $1 trillion to $2 trillion in damages to society's high-tech infrastructure and require four to 10 years for complete recovery. By comparison, Hurricane Katrina caused "only" a fraction of that damage.


    Quantifying the Risk from Severe Solar Storms

    Just how frequent are these extreme storms? According to records of past events, the earth experienced one occurrence in the last 150 years. Therefore, one might conclude the yearly chance of occurrence is one in 150. Some estimates suggest there is a 12 percent chance for an extreme storm to occur within the next 10 years, according to space physicist Pete Riley, senior scientist at Predictive Science in San Diego, Calif., writing in Space Weather. But these estimates ignore the physical details of electric grid risk. As a result, Atmospheric and Environmental Research is currently working with several insurance carriers to establish a much more rigorous view on this.


    Although our work is ongoing, we believe a Carrington-like event is not all that rare or even unlikely. ... In fact, severe space weather events have occurred much more recently. In March, the sun emitted the biggest solar flare in five years. Fortunately, the orientation of the solar storm's magnetic field meant it didn't damage electronic systems here on Earth. ... On July 23, a CME with a nearly unprecedented speed of 3400 km/s blasted from the Sun, and no matter the magnetic field direction, this would have a powerful impact on Earth. Again, we were lucky, the sunspot was facing away from Earth.

    Power Outage
    Power Outage (Photo credit: mrapplegate)

    One famous example of the grid effect from space weather occurred during the early morning hours of March 13, 1989. A blast of magnetized plasma from the sun triggered a powerful geomagnetic storm. The storm spawned electric currents in the ground and in power lines -- currents that rapidly incapacitated key power grid components. A portion of the Hydro-Quebec power grid failed in a cascade fashion. Several key pieces of equipment sustained damage, including two transformers that had to be removed from service. On the same day throughout North America and the United Kingdom, electrical disturbances barraged power grids for several hours. In New Jersey, a $12 million generation step-up transformer at the Salem nuclear plant suffered permanent insulation damage. ... [Workers] were able to install a spare transformer within a "short" six-month time frame. Over the next two years, there were 12 transformer failures in North America suspected to have resulted from to the storm. The outage was a chilling reminder of our reliance on electrical power -- and the vulnerability of our grid to geomagnetic storms.

    English: Simplified map of power distribution ...
    English: Simplified map of power distribution grid in United States with sections vulnerable to outage during to the larges geomagnetically induced current expected during 100 years of space weather. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    One cause for heightened concern is that the average age of transformers is significantly higher now than it was in 1989, meaning that the damage would be greater from a repeat of this scale of event. Also, in the 23 years since the Quebec grid sustained damaged, global companies and regional economies have increased reliance on the electrical grid dramatically, meaning the impact today of a similar solar event could be even more drastic.


    Artist's rendition of Earth's magnetosphere.
    Artist's rendition of Earth's magnetosphere. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    Strategies to Manage Risk

    In some ways preparing for a space weather outage is similar to outages from other causes. Strategies risk managers can use to mitigate power outage include:

    * backup generators for critical systems
    * redundant and co-located software and data systems, especially for revenue, customer-facing, and customer service operations
    * service interruption endorsements that cover utility outage
    * alternate suppliers for critical components or services, if supply chain risks are not covered

    Geomagnetic Storm In Progress
    Geomagnetic Storm In Progress (Photo credit: NASA Goddard Photo and Video)

    A long-term electrical outage caused by space weather could last for a week, a month, or even a year. There is no way to prevent an outage from striking your company. In this scenario, the financial exposure to the insurance industry escalates to an enterprise level. Losses can accumulate from multiple coverages and lines, and movements in the broad financial markets are likely.

    Insurers should start to address this issue by quantifying their company's financial exposure to service interruption events. ... AER scientists are now allowing risk managers to take a quantitative approach to evaluate the impact of both short-term and long-term power outages. In this context, short-term means hours or a day, with a recurrence interval of a few years.

    C3-class Solar Flare Erupts on Sept. 8, 2010 [...
    C3-class Solar Flare Erupts on Sept. 8, 2010 [Video] (Photo credit: NASA Goddard Photo and Video)

    At the primary insurer level, mitigation strategies for long-term outages might include:

    * Review your company's policy language ...
    * Implement loss control strategies, such as advising insureds to have preapproved business-continuity plans, including alternative locations for operations.
    * Evaluate the adequacy of aggregate cover insurance currently in place.


    The risk of a space weather-related power outage, for example, is lower in certain places in the United States. A company with multiple locations could have a business-continuity plan that includes relocation of critical functions to a safer area when the duration of the outage is uncertain. Data access at new locations is one of many factors to consider. Improved tools to quantify the risk open opportunities for carriers to provide new products or expanded coverages that previously were not feasible.

    IN SPACE - JUNE 7:  In this handout from NASA/...
    IN SPACE - JUNE 7: In this handout from NASA/Solar Dynamics Observatory, a solar large flare erupts off the sun June 7, 2011 in space. A large cloud of particles flew up and then was pulled back down to the sun's surface. According to NASA, the event is not suppose have any effect once the particles reach the earth on either June 8 or June 9. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)

    Beyond financial exposure, another challenge posed by power outages is communication. Insurers need to consider how their own internal operations will proceed during such an event. ... Corporate reputation -- including a clear demonstration of risk readiness -- should be part of the company's enterprise risk management plan.

    When the next event strikes, companies that communicate pro-actively will establish themselves as trustworthy leaders in the eyes of their customers, employees, the media and local government.

    Insurers must remember that although the chance of a long-term space weather outage is modest, they cannot disregard it. When a long-term outage does occur, the cost will be staggering. In short, the lesson here may be to "never say never again."

    Kyle Beatty is vice president of the Business Solutions Division and Nicole L. Homeier is a staff scientist in remote sensing at Atmospheric and Environmental Research, a member of the Verisk Analytics family of companies.

    Copyright 2012© LRP Publications
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Dead Money

    Cash has been piling up on companies’ balance sheets since before the crisis.


    CFO.com (http://s.tt/1s892)
    Economist Staff


    ...  In America, third-quarter profits and revenues for companies in the S&P 500 index appear to have fallen year on year for the first time since 2009, according to Thomson Reuters. Profits for roughly half the firms in the European Stoxx 600 have fallen short of expectations so far.

    ...  The four worries unnerving business are: the euro-zone crisis; upheaval in the Middle East; a possible recession in China; and America’s economic health and “fiscal cliff”—the combination of tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to occur at the end of this year.

    .
    Net Income
    Net Income (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
    .. Investment has steadily risen since the recession ended, but not as vigorously as profits. In America, ... nominal capital expenditure this year (on an annualised basis) has risen by 6% compared with 2007; internal cash flow is up by 32%. ... Firms in the S&P 500 held roughly $900 billion of cash at the end of June, according to Thomson Reuters, down a bit from a year earlier but still 40% up on 2008.

    ... Japanese companies’ liquid assets have soared by around 75% since 2007, to $2.8 trillion, according to
    buried cash
    buried cash (Photo credit: rick)
    ISI Group, a broker. Cash stockpiles have continued to grow in Britain and Canada, too, ... “Dead money” is how Mark Carney, the Bank of Canada’s governor, has described the nearly $300 billion in cash Canadian companies now hold, 25% more than in 2008. Mr Carney admonished them to “put money to work and if they can’t think of what to do with it, they should give it back to their shareholders.”

    No single factor seems to explain companies’ high savings. The Bank of England notes that natural-resource companies account for a disproportionate share of the cash build-up. That may reflect the boom in commodities prices and the paucity of promising new sources of supply.

    Low interest rates have reduced borrowing costs, adding roughly a percentage point to American profit margins, according to BCA Research. ... The financial crisis has made firms more skittish about relying on banks or securities markets for funds. ...

    A rapid reversal is unlikely. That’s because rising corporate saving has deeper roots than the crisis, the commodities boom or this interest-rate cycle. In a recent study Loukas Karabarbounis and Brent Neiman at the University of Chicago found that across 51 countries they examined between 1975 and 2007, companies’ share of private saving rose in aggregate by 20 percentage points. In countries where corporate saving rose, labour’s share of GDP in the corporate sector shrank, by five percentage points in aggregate.

    Mr Karabarbounis and Mr Neiman link both rising corporate saving and labour’s shrinking share of GDP to a fall in the relative price of investment goods that began in the early 1980s. That drop may be down to the plunging cost of computing, or to the shift in capital-goods production towards lower-wage developing countries, or both.

    Whatever the reason, firms have responded by substituting away from labour and towards capital, and by more than textbook economic models imply. And to finance this investment companies have steadily boosted saving over time. ...

    The authors do not have comparable data for all 51 countries since 2007. But they do have numbers for the four largest economies (see chart). The data there show that the corporate share of private savings has since dipped a bit, in part because household savings have risen, although it remains high in absolute terms. (Labour’s share of GDP has stabilised at a low level.)

    The urge to save may be lessening. Japanese firms, with few growth prospects at home, have been making foreign deals. Marc Zenner of JPMorgan Chase notes that in the past 18 months firms that announce acquisitions have been rewarded with higher share prices.

    Yet even if they are loosening the purse strings a bit, companies are unlikely to abandon their frugal ways in the near future. Falling corporate-tax rates have increased the appeal of capital over labour; heightened uncertainty and capricious funding markets seem a recurring part of the landscape. That should make firms all the more determined to fund growth internally. Between now and 2016, GE expects to generate $100 billion in cash, enough to finance investment, acquisitions and dividends, and to buy back enough stock that shares outstanding will be lower than before the crisis. Asked recently if GE was tempted to spend more of its cash pile on acquisitions, Jeffrey Immelt, the chief executive, replied: “It’s not burning a hole in our pocket.”

    © The Economist Newspaper Limited, London (November 3, 2013)


    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Monday, November 5, 2012

    EBN legal contributor: Romney can’t repeal PPACA on day one

    By Kelley M. Butler
    November 5, 2012
    On the eve of Election Day, it soon will be time to shift from rhetoric to results.

    Whether they support President Obama or former governor Mitt Romney, a major issue for benefits professionals is the future of health care reform. While an Obama re-election means full-steam ahead for implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Romney vowed throughout the campaign to repeal PPACA on day one of his presidency.

    However, each man faces obstacles for achieving his agenda, according to EBN legal contributor Frank Palmieri. Palmieri, an employee benefits attorney with Palmieri & Eisenberg in Princeton, N.J., offers his thoughts on what lies ahead for PPACA regardless of who wins at the ballot box tomorrow.

    Mitt Romney
    Mitt Romney (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
    Should Romney win the White House, repealing PPACA at all — let alone on day one — will prove difficult, if not impossible, Palmieri says, citing a Washington Post article that points out that President-elect Romney most likely would not have the congressional majority needed to overturn the law legislatively.

    “The president is only one of the three prongs in our government,” Palmieri says. “And he can say, ‘I promise to repeal it,’ but he can’t do it by himself.” Even if PPACA does get repealed, he adds, “I think there are some [PPACA provisions] that are not going to go away, [like] coverage for pre-existing conditions and coverage for children up to age 26,” citing the provisions’ public popularity and that the dependent eligibility extension already has become entrenched in employer plans….

    I
    Official photographic portrait of US President...
    Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
    n the case of an Obama re-election, the president will have to kickstart staffing the Health and Human services Department, …. “HHS isn’t staffed up for implementation,” Palmieri says. “Hiring would have to be fast and furious.”

    Obama also will have to cope with employers that have been sluggish on PPACA compliance and states that have been slow to create the infrastructure for health insurance exchanges. “A lot of people have been on the sidelines watching and waiting to see what happens with the election,” Palmieri notes, adding that there is an advantage for employers who began compliance from the outset. “It happens all the time in benefits — those who act early get to act twice, For [companies that] are proactive and get started on compliance, deadlines get extended and rules get changed.”

    Maximum Out-of-Pocket Premium Payments Under PPACA
    Maximum Out-of-Pocket Premium Payments Under PPACA (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
    If the president wins a second term, Palmieri says, employers will have to start “doing the numbers. If you have 47, 48, 49 employees, are you not going to hire because you want to avoid” PPACA’s requirement to offer health coverage for employers with 50 or more workers.

    Larger employers already subject to the coverage mandate, “will want to see if the exchanges are an effective alternative.” For employers who do opt to send employees to exchanges, he forecasts they’ll “have to hire someone in the payroll or HR department [to be] what I call the exchange manager, because if you have employees [in multiple states], you’ll have to manage exchanges in all of those states. It’s a whole new position I think we’ll have by 2014.”

    Another assessment for employers to make in an Obama second term is reviewing part-time staff “to see who’s working an average of 30 hours a week, and whether to cut back on the hours they work,” he says. “Say Mary, John and Harry are 30 hours a week and you haven’t given them benefits in the past. Now, they have to come into your plan,” because PPACA mandates coverage for part-time employees working at least 30 hours per week.

    Or, a final consideration for employers would be to “drop coverage altogether and pay the penalty. A lot of large employers have already indicated that they’re thinking about that seriously,” Palmieri says. “All you need is one or two large employers to do it, and others will consider it a viable option.”
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Monday, October 29, 2012

    No matter who wins presidential race, voters pessimistic on health care’s future

    By Editorial Staff

    October 29, 2012

    It may not be exactly an October surprise, but it appears the public has low expectations for the future of the American health care, regardless of who sits in the Oval Office after inauguration day. Though many views fall along voters’ party lines, a new survey form TeleVox indicates that neither Republicans nor Democrats are filled with optimism when it comes to health care reform.

    The survey, out this month, was conducted by Kelton Research and TeleVox, which reports that 78% of respondents believe the country’s health care system will stay the same or worsen if the White House changes hands. Meanwhile some 72% also believe it will stay the same or worsen if it doesn’t.

    Not all of the dismal views are bipartisan. Eighty-seven percent of Democrats think a change in leadership will cause the nation’s health issues to worsen, according to the survey; 93% of Republicans think problems will grow if the Democrats remain in power.

    Only 9% of Republicans believe four more years will bring the costs of preventive care down, versus 27% of Democrats. Some 24% of Democrats and 64% of Republicans think reelection will bring these costs up, TeleVox reports. Two-fifths of respondents think preventive costs will rise no matter who carries the day on Nov. 6.

    One good thing both sides agree on about preventive care: it matters. More than 95% across the board say preventive medicine is important, with 93% agreeing with statement “it’s less expensive to prevent a serious condition or disease than it is to treat it.” To American voters, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

    Around 30% of both parties report feeling unknowledgeable about what preventive services their health plan offers. Fifty-seven percent of Republicans and 59% of Democrats tell TeleVox that a doctor recommendation is the No. 1 motivator to take a preventive care measure. Forty percent of Democrats and just one percentage point more of Republicans say cost is the biggest reason they have not utilized preventive care.