Pages

Showing posts with label Company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Company. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The Seven Habits of Spectacularly Unsuccessful Executives - Forbes


Forbes
1/02/2012 @ 10:47
Eric Jackson, Contributor


Cover via Amazon
Sydney Finkelstein, the Steven Roth Professor of Management at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, published “Why Smart Executives Fail” 8 years ago.
In it, he shared some of his research on what over 50 former high-flying companies – like Enron, Tyco, WorldCom, Rubbermaid, and Schwinn – did to become complete failures.  It turns out that the senior executives at the companies all had 7 Habits in common.  Finkelstein calls them the Seven Habits of Spectacularly Unsuccessful Executives.

Here are the habits, as Finkelstein described in a 2004 article:

Habit # 1:  They see themselves and their companies as dominating their environment
This first habit may be the most insidious, since it appears to be highly desirable.  Shouldn’t a company try to dominate its business environment, shape the future of its markets and set the pace within them?  Yes,but there’s a catch.  Unlike successful leaders, failed leaders who never question their dominance fail to realize they are at the mercy of changing circumstances….
CEOs who fall prey to this belief suffer from the illusion of personal pre-eminence:…  As far as they’re concerned, everyone else in the company is there to execute their personal vision for the company. 
Warning Sign for #1:  A lack of respect

Habit #2:  They identify so completely with the company that there is no clear boundary between their personal interests and their corporation’s interests
…  We want business leaders to be completely committed to their companies, with their interests tightly aligned with those of the company.  But digging deeper, you find that failed executives weren’t identifying too little with the company, but rather too much.  Instead of treating companies as enterprises that they needed to nurture, failed leaders treated them as extensions of themselves.  And with that, a “private empire” mentality took hold.

CEOs who possess this outlook often use their companies to carry out personal ambitions.  The most slippery slope of all for these executives is their tendency to use corporate funds for personal reasons.  … Being the CEO of a sizable corporation today is probably the closest thing to being king of your own country, and that’s a dangerous title to assume.
Warning Sign for #2: A question of character

Habit #3:  They think they have all the answers
… Leaders who are invariably crisp and decisive tend to settle issues so quickly they have no opportunity to grasp the ramifications. Worse, because these leaders need to feel they have all the answers, they aren’t open to learning new ones.

…  Leaders who need to have all the answers shut out other points of view. When your company or organization is run by someone like this, you’d better hope the answers he comes up with are going to be the right ones.  …
Warning Sign for #3:  A leader without followers

Habit #4:  They ruthlessly eliminate anyone who isn’t completely behind them
CEOs who think their job is to instill belief in their vision also think that it is their job to get everyone to buy into it.  Anyone who doesn’t rally to the cause is undermining the vision.  Hesitant managers have a choice: Get with the plan or leave.

The problem with this approach is that it’s both unnecessary and destructive. … In fact, by eliminating all dissenting and contrasting viewpoints, destructive CEOs cut themselves off from their best chance of seeing and correcting problems as they arise.  Sometimes CEOs who seek to stifle dissent only drive it underground. Once this happens, the entire organization falters.  …  Eventually, these CEOs had everyone on their staff completely behind them. But where they were headed was toward disaster.  And no one was left to warn them.
Warning Sign for #4:  Executive departures

Habit #5: They are consummate spokespersons, obsessed with the company image
You know these CEOs: high-profile executives who are constantly in the public eye.  The problem is that amid all the media frenzy and accolades, these leaders’ management efforts become shallow and ineffective. …

Behind these media darlings is a simple fact of executive life: CEOs don’t achieve a high level of media attention without devoting themselves assiduously to public relations.  When CEOs are obsessed with their image, they have little time for operational details. …

As a final negative twist, when CEOs make the company’s image their top priority, they run the risk of using financial-reporting practices to promote that image.  Instead of treating their financial accounts as a control tool, they treat them as a public-relations tool. The creative accounting that was apparently practiced by such executives as Enron’s Jeffrey Skilling or Tyco’s Kozlowski is as much or more an attempt to promote the company’s image as it is to deceive the public: In their eyes, everything that the company does is public relations.
Warning Sign of #5:  Blatant attention-seeking

Habit #6: They underestimate obstacles
Part of the allure of being a CEO is the opportunity to espouse a vision. Yet, when CEOs become so enamored of their vision, they often overlook or underestimate the difficulty of actually getting there.  And when it turns out that the obstacles they casually waved aside are more troublesome than they anticipated, these CEOs have a habit of plunging full-steam into the abyss.  …

…  Some feel an enormous need to be right in every important decision they make, because if they admit to being fallible, their position as CEO might seem precarious. Once a CEO admits that he or she made the wrong call, there will always be people who say the CEO wasn’t up to the job.  These unrealistic expectations make it exceedingly hard for a CEO to pull back from any chosen course of action, which not surprisingly causes them to push that much harder.  …
Warning Sign of #6:  Excessive hype

Habit #7: They stubbornly rely on what worked for them in the past
Many CEOs on their way to becoming spectacularly unsuccessful accelerate their company’s decline by reverting to what they regard as tried-and-true methods. … Instead of considering a range of options that fit new circumstances, they use their own careers as the only point of reference and do the things that made them successful in the past.  …

Frequently, CEOs who fall prey to this habit owe their careers to some “defining moment,” a critical decision or policy choice that resulted in their most notable success.  … The problem is that after people have had the experience of that defining moment, if they become the CEO of a large company, they allow their defining moment to define the company as well – no matter how unrealistic it has become.
Warning Sign of #7:  Constantly referring to what worked in the past

The bottom line: If you exhibit several of these traits, now is the time to stamp them out from your repertoire.  If your boss or several senior executives at your company exhibit several of these traits, now is the time to start looking for a new job.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Forget Your Elevator Pitch — What's Your Dumbwaiter Pitch?

Harvard Business Review wordmarkImage via Wikipedia


Harvard Business Review
12:01 PM Tuesday April 20, 2010
…Today, elevator pitches are the economic equivalent of speeches at a beauty pageant: predictable, often vapid, always bland.

…Try a Dumbwaiter Pitch instead. … Its goal? To strip an organization right down to its bones, and see how compelling it really is.

What's the one-word description of your business? …The most common answer is: hmming, hawing, and silence. The second most common answer is an imaginary benefit. The third most common answer is a raw product… . All three answers reveal a business with whose foundation, its economic concept, is confused, muddled, and perhaps even nonexistent. …


What's Twitter's Dumbwaiter Pitch? I'd say: "alerts." And that's powerful in a roiling, seething world where risk and volatility are vastly amplified. Information that alerts you to possibilities and opportunities matters more than ever before. … Twitter is one of the few companies in the economy with a solid, compelling Dumbwaiter Pitch.

In simplicity lie the seeds of explosively powerful propositions. In complexity, only confusion, incoherence, and uncompetitiveness.

Reductive, simplistic, restrictive? Think again. Nearly every disruptive business, in fact, has a Dumbwaiter Pitch as pure, simple, and powerful as Niagara Falls. Google? Search. Apple? Beauty. Lego? Creativity. …
The Dumbwaiter Pitch is so powerful because it cuts through the obfuscation, glad-handing, and double-talk … and asks them to get straight to the real point. And, of course, like the sharpest of scalpels, it reveals where there never was any meat on the bones to begin with.

Only businesses with a razor-sharp, laser-focused vision — and a disruptive economic concept — can craft a Dumbwaiter Pitch. Do you have what it takes? What's the one-word description of your business?

Umair Haque
Umair Haque
Umair Haque is Director of the Havas Media Lab and author of The New Capitalist Manifesto: Building a Disruptively Better Business. He also founded Bubblegeneration, an agenda-setting advisory boutique that shaped strategies across media and consumer industries.
Umair Haque
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 15, 2010

Tech Professionals Say Venture Capital Model Has Changed Forever

Portfolio.com - a bizjournals property
A slower market for initial public offerings is likely the new norm, and venture capitalists are likely to make smaller bets on smaller companies and make their returns from mergers and acquisitions of their portfolio companies.
That, at least, is what tech honchos surveyed by DLA Piper expect. That’s a major change for one of the most glamorous corners of the innovation business.
It may well mark the end of the big, bold, VC plays, said Peter Astiz, global co-head of the DLA Piper Technology Sector Practice.
Diagram of venture capital fund structure for ...Image via Wikipedia“This is a profound, game-changing development," Astiz said Tuesday in a statement. "If there is a long-term expectation that the IPO market will not rebound, that means a reduction in the number of dramatic ‘home runs’ for venture capital investors and lower overall returns. Fewer IPOs also means fewer small and medium-size public technology companies, which traditionally have been the acquirers for venture-backed company exits.”
Astiz went on to say that tech companies would continue to move forward and investors would still be active, but that the venture model is changing. "For startup tech companies, the bar is being raised, capital will be harder to come by, and pressure to perform will increase.”
Those expectations are reflected in the third-quarter report on venture exits by the National Venture Capital Association’s report in conjunction with Thomson Reuters. (Download a PDF of the report by clicking here.)
Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...Image via CrunchBaseThe market for public offerings of venture-backed companies is recovering from the disastrous 2009 period. But it’s nowhere near the levels seen in the boom times of the late 1990s, and there haven’t been any blockbuster IPOs like that of Google.
Instead, venture capitalists have made their money through the sale of their portfolio companies to other firms. In the third quarter, there were 27 deals with disclosed values worth $3.8 billion, up from 22 deals worth $2.9 billion. As for IPOs, there were 14, worth $1.2 billion, in the third quarter. …
The technology professionals surveyed by DLA Piper agree. Nearly 60 percent say the venture model has been permanently altered. But that’s not all bad news, because with technologies like cloud-based computing available, it’s cheaper now to build a company. So VCs may be able to make smaller bets across more companies and get high rates of returns on those small bets.
In other topics, tech leaders told DLA Piper they expect:
  • The economy will continue to grow, albeit slowly, with 85 percent of those surveyed expecting at least a couple of percentage points of growth in the coming year.
  • Seventy-two percent expect sales increases in the coming year.
  • Forty-three percent expect to keep staffing levels flat.
“While some economists and headlines question whether the U.S. economy is headed for a double-dip recession, technology leaders seem confident of a sustained recovery,” Astiz said. “Tech leaders are forecasting stronger sales and earnings across the board, yet they are not planning to invest in hiring nor R&D. This suggests that we may be in for a prolonged period of guarded investment and slow growth.”
Enhanced by Zemanta