Pages

Showing posts with label Compensation and Benefits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Compensation and Benefits. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Weird ways to make work wonderful

CBSNews.com:
June 4, 2013, 7:00 AM
By 
MARGARET HEFFERNAN
(MoneyWatch) Every leader in every company struggles with ways to make work more engaging. It's always hard to find great people and is vital to keep them, since internal hires tend to be more successful than external ones. ... [What] can you do to enliven the daily grind? Here are some ideas:
creativity
creativity (Photo credit: Sean MacEntee)
Encourage creativity. Creative people get ideas by watching what other creative people make. That means they are productive to the degree that they have the time and opportunity to have a life. SHIFT Communications reimburses each employee $100 per year when they attend Broadway shows, sporting adventures or go to the opera. It's a great way of making sure no one gets stale; creativity feeds on creativity. And companies don't have idea -- people do.
Meeting-free days. Incessant meetings are the one reason invariably given when people explain why they left their jobs to work for themselves. So reward employees with one day a week when there won't be any meetings. Mondays are popular choices because everyone can start the week by being productive; other companies prefer Fridays because people leave feeling their work has been finished and they're free for the weekend. Whichever you prefer - it costs nothing and gains a lot.
Productivity software maker Do.com (recently acquired by Salesforce.com) goes one step further: It has no meetings at all -- just a show-and-tell session on Mondays. That's it. The company also provides a catered lunch four days a week and a staff-built jukebox with everyone's favorite tunes.
Image representing Credit Karma as depicted in...
Image via CrunchBase
Get to know everyone. At financial tracking site Credit Karma, employees come from all over the U.S. but need to get to know one another. To foster a sense of camaraderie, the company hosts weekly game nights with computer and board games, and also hosts movie nights. That means people get to know each other well beyond the transactional relationships that work normally develops. These events aren't hugely expensive, but the head of talent at the company, Ragini Parma, says they make all the difference.
Zeroturnaround guys
Zeroturnaround guys (Photo credit: michalgruca)
Vacation together. Tech firm ZeroTurnaround took its employees on vacation to Crete for a week last September. Employees from Boston, Prague and Estonia spent a week working in a villa overlooking the Mediterranean, and they now know each other pretty well. Tech recruitment firm Eliassen Group takes everyone in the company -- and their immediate families -- on a cruise if they meet their annual targets. The operative principle: The company's success depends on employees helping each other. 
Hold a "bring your pet to work" day. I can't quite explain pet passion, but if my Facebook page is anything to go by people love their pets beyond reason. I'm not sure a lot of work gets done in companies that host such events, but I feel pretty sure employee engagement and communication improves -- as long as there aren't too many dog fights.
© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.l













'via 
Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 3, 2013

Attention advisers: State-run retirement plans may put your livelihood at risk - Articles - Employee Benefit Adviser

Employee Benefit Adviser:
Posted May 31, 2013 by Aaron Friedman at 03:48PM

There is a movement afoot to put state governments in the business of offering retirement plans to private citizens, which would ultimately eliminate opportunities and siphon business away from financial professionals.  
Lawmakers in several states have proposed that states create government-run plans for private sector workers. While the details differ from state to state, every proposal this year would require employers who do not currently offer a plan to adopt a state-run plan, either in direct competition with the private sector or, in some cases, squeezing out the private sector — including financial professionals — altogether. Proponents claim they are solving a crisis where people are not saving enough for retirement because there is a lack of access to affordable savings options. ...
In past years, states like Maryland, Tennessee and Washington have studied this concept and have each determined that barriers to savings have more to do with economic realities than lack of access to plans. People are concerned about making ends meet or paying for health care. Saving for long-term goals is a luxury that takes a back seat to current needs. Those states also outlined the significant up-front and ongoing costs to taxpayers if a state-run plan was put into place. 
The Indiana State House
The Indiana State House (Photo credit: netmonkey)
But none of the proposals this year in Maryland, Maine, Illinois, Indiana, Connecticut or Oregon calls for a study to determine the actual need and, importantly, costs to tax payers. ... There is no indication   these states understand the true economic drivers of inadequate savings or the true costs of establishing and operating retirement plans (think — complying with ERISA). ... Fortunately, nothing passed this year in Maryland, Maine, Illinois, or Indiana. However, the issue is still very hot in both the Connecticut and Oregon legislatures.
... Lawmakers need to understand that retirement saving requires more than providing access by mandating a state-run program. It requires better economic conditions so more people can afford to save for retirement and employers can afford to offer plans. It requires the guidance and expertise of financial professionals to help employers set up plans and employees to participate and save adequately. ...
... If you live in other states, you aren’t out of the woods. Each year more and more states are considering state-run plans. Keep watch and speak with your legislators proactively. You can also get involved with your trade organizations at a local and national level. ...
Friedman is the tax-exempt national practice leader with the Principal Financial Group, an investment management and retirement leader. A noted expert on 403(b) plan design, he has been consulting with tax-exempt organizations for over 20 years and has been in the retirement plan business since 1986. This blog originally ran on The Principal blog. Follow Aaron on Twitter @1AaronFriedman1

Principal Financial Group
Principal Financial Group (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Insurance products and plan administrative services are provided by Principal Life Insurance Company. Securities are offered through Princor Financial Services Corporation, 1-800-547-7754, Member SIPC and/or independent broker dealers.  Securities sold by a Princor® Registered Representative are offered through Princor.  Princor and Principal Life are members of the Principal Financial Group® (The Principal®), Des Moines, IA 50392.

'via Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Motivating people: Getting beyond money

The economic slump offers business leaders a chance to more effectively reward talented employees by emphasizing non-financial motivators rather than bonuses.

McKinsey & Company:
November 2009 | byMartin Dewhurst, Matthew Guthridge, and Elizabeth Mohr


Companies around the world are cutting back their financial-incentive programs, but few have used other ways of inspiring talent. We think they should. Numerous studies1 have concluded that for people with satisfactory salaries, some non-financial motivators are more effective than extra cash in building long-term employee engagement in most sectors, job functions, and business contexts. Many financial rewards mainly generate short-term boosts of energy, which can have damaging unintended consequences. Indeed, the economic crisis, ... gives business leaders a great opportunity to reassess the combination of financial and nonfinancial incentives that will serve their companies best through and beyond the downturn.
A recent McKinsey Quarterly survey2 underscores the opportunity. The respondents view three noncash motivators—praise from immediate managers, leadership attention (for example, one-on-one conversations), and a chance to lead projects or task forces—as no less or even more effective motivators than the three highest-rated financial incentives: cash bonuses, increased base pay, and stock or stock options (exhibit). The survey’s top three nonfinancial motivators play critical roles in making employees feel that their companies value them, take their well-being seriously, and strive to create opportunities for career growth. These themes recur constantly in most studies on ways to motivate and engage employees.

Exhibit


It’s not about the money


Three nonfinancial incentives are even more effective motivators than the three highest-rated financial incentives.
... Money’s traditional role as the dominant motivator is under pressure from declining corporate revenues, sagging stock markets, and increasing scrutiny by regulators, activist shareholders, and the general public. Our in-depth interviews with HR directors suggest that many companies have cut remuneration costs by 15 percent or more.
What’s more, employee motivation is sagging throughout the world—morale has fallen at almost half of all companies, according to another McKinsey survey3 —at a time when businesses need engaged leaders and other employees willing to go above and beyond expectations. Organizations face the challenge of retaining talented people amid morale-sapping layoffs that tend to increase voluntary turnover over the medium term. ... 
... Two-thirds of the executives we surveyed cited cost reductions as one of the top three reasons for the changes; 27 percent made changes to increase employee motivation; and only 9 percent had the goal of attracting new talent. ...
Even though overall reliance on financial incentives fell over the past 12 months, a number of companies curtailed their use of non-financial ones as well. Thirteen percent of the survey respondents report that managers praise their subordinates less often, 20 percent that opportunities to lead projects or task forces are scarcer, and 26 percent that leadership attention to motivate talent is less forthcoming.
Why haven’t many organizations made more use of cost-effective non-financial motivators at a time when cash is hard to find? ... “Managers see motivation in terms of the size of the compensation,” explained an HR director from the financial-services industry.
Another reason is probably that non-financial ways to motivate people do, on the whole, require more time and commitment from senior managers. One HR director we interviewed spoke of their tendency to “hide” in their offices... This lack of interaction between managers and their people creates a highly damaging void that saps employee engagement.
Some far-thinking companies, though, are working hard to understand what motivates employees and to act on their findings. One global pharmaceutical company conducted a survey that showed that in some countries employees emphasized the role of senior leadership; in others, social responsibility. ... One biotech company has re-framed the incentives issue by putting the focus on “recognition” instead of “reward” in order to inspire a more thoughtful discussion about what motivates people.
The top three non-financial motivators our survey respondents cited offer guidance on where management might focus. The HR directors we spoke with, for example, emphasized leadership attention as a way to signal the importance of retaining top talent. ...
“One-on-one meetings between staff and leaders are hugely motivational,” explained an HR director from a mining and basic-materials company—“they make people feel valued during these difficult times.” By contrast, our survey’s respondents rated large-scale communications events, such as the town hall meetings common during the economic crisis, as one of the least effective non-financial motivators, along with unpaid or partially paid leave, training programs, and flexible work arrangements. ...
A chance to lead projects is a motivator that only half of the companies in our survey use frequently, although this is a particularly powerful way of inspiring employees to make a strong contribution at a challenging time. Such opportunities also develop their leadership capabilities, with long-term benefits for the organization. One HR director in the basic-materials industry explained that involvement in special projects “makes people feel like they’re part of the answer—and part of the company’s future.” ...
With profitability returning to some geographies and sectors, we see signs that bonuses will be making a comeback: for instance, 28 percent of our survey respondents say that their companies plan to reintroduce financial incentives in the coming year. While such rewards certainly have an important role to play, business leaders would do well to consider the lessons of the crisis and think broadly about the best ways to engage and inspire employees. A talent strategy that emphasizes the frequent use of the right non-financial motivators would benefit most companies in bleak times and fair. By acting now, they could exit the downturn stronger than they entered it.

About the authors

Martin Dewhurst is a director in McKinsey’s London office, where Matthew Guthridge is an associate principal and Elizabeth Mohr is a consultant.
'via Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta

Proposed 28% Cap on Tax Deductions

NAPA Net:



John Carl






The ERISA consultants at the Columbia Management Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk regularly receive calls from financial advisors on a broad array of technical topics related to IRAs and qualified retirement plans. A recent call with a financial advisor in Minnesota ... asked:
“I’ve heard that Capitol Hill may be capping deductions for taxpayers. Is this true, and can you provide more details on the cap?”
Highlights of Discussion
• It is true that the 2014 budget proposal contains a provision that, if enacted into law, would limit the tax value of specified deductions or exclusions from adjusted gross income (AGI) and all itemized deductions for taxpayers in the 33%, 35% and 39.6% tax brackets. The cap would reduce the value of the deduction to 28%. A similar limitation also would apply under the alternative minimum tax.
EXAMPLE: Trina is in the 39.6% tax bracket. She has a deduction worth $100. Under present law, the deduction would save her $39.60 in taxes. Under this proposed cap, the value of her tax savings would be reduced to $28.
• The income exclusions and deductions that could be limited by this provision would include the following:
— Employee contributions to defined contribution retirement plans and individual retirement arrangements
— Any tax-exempt state and local bond interest
— Employer-sponsored health insurance paid for by employers or with pretax employee dollars
— Health insurance costs of self-employed individuals
— The deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities
— Certain trade or business deductions of employees
— Moving expenses
— Contributions to health savings accounts and Archer Medical Savings Accounts
— Interest on education loans
— Certain higher education expenses
• If a deduction or exclusion for contributions to retirement plans or individual retirement arrangements is limited by this proposed cap, then the taxpayer’s basis will be adjusted to reflect the additional tax imposed.
• As proposed, the 28% cap on deductions would take effect Jan. 1, 2014.
Conclusion
It is important to keep in mind that the 2014 budget proposal merely starts the formal budget negotiation process with the House and Senate. The 28% cap on deductions is only a proposal at this point. Financial advisors who understand the importance of any potential changes to contribution and accrual limits and/or deductions set themselves apart from the average advisor and are better positioned to support their clients.
The Columbia Management Retirement Learning Center Resource Desk is staffed by the Retirement Learning Center, LLC, a third-party industry consultant that is not affiliated with Columbia Management. For informational purposes only. Please consult a tax advisor or attorney for specific tax or legal needs. © 2013 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. Used with permission.
'via Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 20, 2013

A Powerful Stock Price Predictor

Exhaustive research shows that profit and revenue don’t actually predict stock price, but some other, little-used metrics do.
CFO.com:
David McCann



A new study provides perhaps the strongest evidence to date that certain human-capital metrics can predict a company’s performance in the stock markets.
The research was nothing if not robust. Through extensive use of regression analysis, it tested the relationships between a set of human-capital metrics and stock-price movements at 22,100 companies over a 16-year period, 1996 through 2011.
Graziadio School of Business and Management
Graziadio School of Business and Management (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A key finding of the study – performed by Jeff Higgins, CEO of the Human Capital Management Institute, and Pepperdine University professor Donald Atwater – may surprise investors, stock analysts and finance executives themselves.
Generally speaking, a company’s net income and to a lesser extent revenue are considered the gold standards for shaping expectations of its stock’s future performance. ... In fact, both are statistically insignificant, as is pure net profit without association with any human-capital metrics.
Instead, two metrics used by some human-capital analysts, ... are powerful predictors of stock price, the research found. One, called “Return on Human Capital Investment” (Return on HCI), compares “Total Cost of Workforce” (TCOW) to net operating profit. (TCOW includes: all direct and indirect cash or equity compensation for employees and contingent workers; paid employee benefits, perks and rewards; retirement-related costs for both current and former employees; and costs for worker training, recruiting, employee relations, and severance and legal settlements.)
The other highly predictive metric is “Human Capital ROI Ratio.” It measures the ratio of return on revenue (net of non-workforce expenses) to TCOW. For example, say a company has $1 billion in revenue and $800 million in total expenses, $500 million of which are people costs. To arrive at HC ROI ratio, subtract the $300 million nonpeople costs from revenue, leaving $700 million, and divide that by the $500 million in people costs.
English: Human Capital Investment Model!!
English: Human Capital Investment Model!! (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
In essence, the two metrics are different ways of measuring the percentage return on $1 invested in the work force, assuming all other factors remain constant. In the above example for Human Capital ROI Ratio, the result is expressed as 1.40, or a 40-cents positive return on the invested dollar. ...
“Everyone thinks net profit drives stock price,” says Higgins, a former CFO, “and in my old finance world I thought so too. But what really drives stock price is productivity. Some might say Return on HCI and Human Capital ROI Ratio are synthetic profit metrics, but we see them as productivity metrics – the return on people’s productivity. And when those numbers improve, your stock price jumps.”...
On average, given a 10 percent gain in the three most predictive human-capital metrics – Return on HCI, Human Capital ROI Ratio and TCOW as a percentage of operating expense – stock price jumped by 5.73 percent. By comparison, a 10 percent boost in net income was associated with a stock-price increase of just 0.8 percent. ...
Good performance in profit or revenue per FTE can actually mask otherwise dismal results. For example, the investment banking subsector of the financial services and insurance sector saw median revenue per FTE climb by 21.8 percent over the study period. But median Human Capital ROI Ratio dropped by 29 percent while TCOW ballooned by 47.5 percent, negatively affecting investment banks’ share prices.
Those results, says Higgins – who got his start in the human-capital-management field when he left his finance career to take a job running compensation at IndyMac Bank – portray fewer and fewer high-earning employees getting paid an ever-larger share of industry revenue. It calls into question whether investment-bank shareholders have been properly rewarded for their investments, he notes.
Clearly, there are many reasons behind the rise and fall of stock prices, including macroeconomic ones not under a company’s control. In addition to net income for each company, variables controlled for by regression analyses included real gross domestic product, bank prime loan rate, actual vs. natural unemployment rate, producer price index, consumer price index, industrial production index and S&P 500 index. The study found that even after controlling for those variables, human-capital metrics had significant predictive capability.
But even better was a model employing those factors plus the three most predictive human-capital metrics mentioned above. The model explained from 35% to 64% of movements in stock price, depending on industry sector, according to the study report.
Net profit by itself, without a connection to any human-capital metrics, explained only 1 percent of stock-price movements, the authors wrote.
“If there is an actual statistical or causal link [showing that] human-capital investments do indeed positively impact financial outcomes, then it forms the foundation for ROI-based business cases for [such investments],” the study report states. ...
The idea that human-capital metrics are linked with performance in the equity markets is not new. Groundbreaking research showing a link between training expenditures and stock price was done in the 1990s, and later updated to include additional such links, by Laurie Bassi, a labor economist who is CEO of consulting firm McBassi & Co. Other leaders in the field have included Jac Fitz-enz and Nick Bontis (Fitz-enz actually invented the Human Capital ROI Ratio metric).
Bassi, a registered investment advisor, since 2001 has been operating a fund, populated with stocks of companies known to be leaders in the field of human-capital management, that has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 index.



'via Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta