Pages

Showing posts with label Customer engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Customer engagement. Show all posts

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Persuading Consumers to Sign Long-Term Contracts

Companies that focus on driving customer usage and spending see their conversion rates increase.

strategy+business magazine:

Authors: Yolanda Polo and F. Javier Sese (both University of Zaragoza)
Publisher: Journal of Service Research, vol. 16, no. 2
Date Published: May 2013
Although contracts have become widely used in recent years, pay-as-you-go consumers still account for a large portion of the customer base in many industries and businesses, including legal services, media, telecommunications, repair and maintenance, and entertainment or professional sports. A 2011 study of U.K. and German mobile phone firms, for example, found that more than half of their customers had a prepaid plan and were not tied to a contract.
English: A business ideally is continually see...
English: A business ideally is continually seeking feedback from customers: are the products helpful? are their needs being met? Constructive criticism helps marketers make adjustments to their products and services to adapt to the changing needs of their customers. Source of diagram: here (see public domain declaration at top). Questions: write me at my Wikipedia talk page or email me at thomaswrightsulcer@yahoo.com (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
That’s a problem for companies, because there’s no question that subscribers are more profitable. On average, they generate 4.5 times more revenue than noncontract customers, according to the study. It stands to reason, then, that a small uptick in the number of customers who sign on the dotted line would lead to a significant increase in revenue for companies—including those in business-to-business contexts such as tech support or consulting. However, despite contracts’ clear value to firms, surprisingly little research has been done on how managers can strengthen their companies’ ties with customers to encourage them to sign long-term deals.
This paper aims to fill the gap by identifying the key factors that lie behind customers’ decisions to transition from pay-as-you-go to contract status. Noting that their findings are applicable to several industries, the authors based their study on cell phone users, in part because of the massive size of the mobile market. ... The authors were also drawn to this sector because the contract problem is particularly vexing for telecom operators, who shoulder huge operational costs and face stiff competition for customers, which makes the negative impact of weak and short-term client relationships all the more damaging to their bottom line.
The authors tracked nearly 300 customers, all of whom began as pay-as-you-go clients, of a major mobile communications supplier for four years, gathering user and account data on a monthly basis. About 22 percent of the customers moved to a contract and 78 percent stuck with their pay-as-you-go phone cards, which shows how difficult it can be for firms to secure long-term commitments.
In a series of analyses, the authors found that the first key factor in the decision by customers to make the switch
English: A schematic illustrating the evolving...
English: A schematic illustrating the evolving relationship between the firm and its customers via the marketing orientation, which includes the introduction of a new marketing concept, customer enrichment marketing. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
was whether they exceeded their expected usage: Did their usage regularly exceed the amount of credit they loaded on their cards, and, if so, how big was the gap?
The clear implication for telecom companies, and other types of service providers, is that they can increase the likelihood that customers will sign contracts by getting them to use their service more during the pay-as-you-go period.
In the mobile phone market, for example, companies should encourage their pay-as-you-go customers to install social media applications, online games, or other time-consuming programs that would increase their mobile service use. In other industries, offering discounts, promoting free trials, and bundling services with partner firms are all viable strategies. In addition, employed, female, and younger customers all had usage rates that exceeded their own expectations, so these groups should be among the first targeted by marketers, the authors write.
The second factor influencing the decision by customers to switch to a contract was a variation of the first: The more customers paid when not on a contract, the more likely they were to see the benefits of a long-term deal and make the switch. This doesn’t mean, however, that companies should simply raise rates for noncontract clients, the authors write; over the long term, the higher prices would likely drive away potential customers or cause existing ones to leave. Rather, managers hunting for contract contenders should begin by focusing on customers with a history of higher spending. Once they are identified, these customers should be plied with inducements to exercise their bigger spending habits during the noncontract phase. Companies should offer points for frequent usage in a loyalty program, among other incentives.
Last, customers who had had a longer noncontract relationship with the firm showed a higher probability of joining the contract program, the authors found. Thus, retention strategies and effective customer service are crucial. Although keeping long-standing low-end customers happy with good service is important, companies should keep their eye on the real goal: Strengthening these ties to convert them into more profitable contract-based relationships.
The authors stress that these managerial and marketing insights can be applied more generally to other industries. Internet-based phone companies, music streaming websites, file hosting services, and new-media businesses such as online newspapers and magazines are all facing the same challenge. These findings highlight the need for companies to encourage higher usage and spending during the pay-as-you-go phase.
The recommendations also extend to B2B firms, the authors write. For example, companies specializing in consulting, computer-related support, or legal services can team up with complementary firms to give customers easier access and more opportunities to use services.
“Marketing managers should move from the prevailing backward-looking focus toward a forward-looking focus,” the authors write, “in which each customer’s future considerations are monitored and managed proactively.”
Bottom Line:
Companies can lay the groundwork for customers to sign a contract by tracking and influencing their use of the company’s services in the pay-as-you-go phase. Although getting customers to make the switch is tough, it’s worth the effort because it is so profitable. Companies should target customers who have longer relationships with the firm, spend more during the noncontract phase, and have reason to think they will use the service frequently enough to offset the higher costs of a contract.

AUTHOR PROFILE:

  1. Matt Palmquist is a freelance journalist based in Oakland, Calif.
'via Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

The Dollar Payoff from Social Media

Social Media Outposts
Social Media Outposts (Photo credit: the tartanpodcast)

Consumers who engage with company sites visit stores more often and spend more.

strategy-business.com:
Authors: Rishika Rishika (Texas A&M University), Ashish Kumar (Aalto University), Ramkumar Janakiraman (Texas A&M University), and Ram Bezawada (State University of New York, Buffalo)
Publisher: Information Systems Research; vol. 24, no. 1
Date Published: March 2013
Customers who engage with a company’s social media efforts spend more on its products, according to this paper, which confirms that online platforms not only strengthen the bond between consumers and firms, but can also help boost the bottom line. And the payoff is significant: In this study, customers who interacted with a wine retailer’s social media network visited stores 5.2 percent more often and contributed 5.6 percent more revenue than customers who had a similar shopping history at that retailer but no online involvement.
Recent studies suggest that 75 percent of Internet users engage with social media, and companies are increasingly developing a presence on Facebook, Twitter, and similar platforms in an effort to broaden and improve their interactions with customers. Indeed, studies have shown that social technology allows firms to have dialogues with customers that go far beyond traditional types of promotion or advertising.
Image representing IBM as depicted in CrunchBase
Image via CrunchBase
For companies, however, the right strategies have proven elusive. On the one hand, an article in 2011 reported that 69 percent of small business owners used social media in some way and about 78 percent planned to increase their social media budget. On the other hand, an IBM report from the same year declared that “social media is no longer the adorable baby everyone wants to hold, but the angst-filled adolescent—still immature yet no longer cute—who inspires mixed feelings.”
The question is whether firms can realize a return on their investment in social media. As the authors of this paper write, no study had produced data relating the participation of individual consumers in a firm-hosted site to their purchasing behavior. This study aimed to do just that by examining the impact of social media involvement on the frequency of a customer’s store visits and amount spent.
The authors obtained data from a large specialty firm in the northeastern U.S. that sold wine at its retail locations. In August 2009, the firm created its first webpage on a major social networking platform; it has since invested in the project by regularly updating the site and inviting customers to join and comment. The content is a mix of promotional material, information about community and store events, and advice on wine selection.
The authors began by surveying a large segment of the firm’s customer base in early 2011 to identify who was participating in the firm’s social media initiative—by “following” or becoming a “fan” of the firm, for example. They also gathered data on customers’ demographics and spending habits, including what they bought from other wine shops. Working with the firm, which was tracking its participants on the site, the authors obtained monthly data for a period of more than three years on the social media use and purchases of 394 customers.
English: Infographic on how Social Media are b...
English: Infographic on how Social Media are being used, and how everything is changed by them. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Because customers who engage with a firm through social media may be predisposed to buy its products, the authors’ challenge was to create a control group of customers who were very similar to the participants but did not have online interactions. Accordingly, the authors used 82 weeks of data on spending habits and demographics for both types of customers prior to the launch of the social media site to construct a control sample, in line with widely used matching methods. (To be sure, wine is a product that attracts passionate followers who might be expected to engage more actively in communities, online or off. But in using a control group that had similar buying histories yet chose not to be involved in the retailer’s social media efforts, the researchers essentially removed passion as a variable from the equation, making wine a viable surrogate for other products in this type of study. And because wine is something people are indeed particular about, is purchased regularly throughout the year, and comes with a range of prices and options, its sales are easier to study in this context, the authors say, than a car purchase, for example, or generic grocery shopping.)
The analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the frequency of store visits by the two types of wine customers before the retailer started its site, but the picture changed after the launch. Customers who engaged with the site began to shop at the firm’s stores with greater frequency, and when they did shop, they spent more.
These effects were amplified for certain types of customers: Those who posted more messages tended to buy in larger volumes, preferred special or premium products, and were more loyal to the company. On the other hand, the effects of social media were muted on customers who were more likely to buy products when they were on sale, suggesting that these shoppers might be using social media strictly as a way to find deals and that they were less committed to any one firm. The shopping and purchasing behavior of customers with a narrower focus—in this case, those who typically preferred a particular variety of wine (red, white, or rosé)—was also less affected by their social media use.
The authors point out several implications for managers who may be under pressure, especially in times of economic uncertainty, to defend their promotional budget and prove that their social media spending makes sense. The first recommendation is to nurture customer relationships through social media, to help ensure that the online bond actually translates to a more robust bottom line. In other words, it’s not enough to merely create a Facebook page. Companies should make sure the interface is user-friendly, offer regular updates, send personal messages to specific customers, and encourage users to provide feedback.
But not all customers are the same, the authors warn; nor do they have similar responses to social media networking. The study’s results show the importance of segmenting and targeting customers on the basis of their shopping background, demographics, and history with the firm. “It is vital that managers integrate their knowledge about customers from both offline transactions and online social media sources in order to better serve them,” the authors write.
Finally, companies should create product-specific social media platforms. The findings imply that managers could increase the response to social media efforts by tailoring them to specialized discussion forums or online communities—for example, customers looking to buy premium or unique items.
Bottom Line:
Customers who interact with a firm’s social media site visit its stores more often and spend more when they do, on average, than those with a similar shopping profile but no online relationship with the company. The evidence supports the business value of investing in social media, so long as companies tailor their efforts to specific types of customers and nurture their online presence by providing regular updates and messages.

'via Blog this'
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 26, 2012

The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies

McKinsey & Company

July 2012 | by Michael Chui, James Manyika, Jacques Bughin, Richard Dobbs, Charles Roxburgh, Hugo Sarrazin, Geoffrey Sands and Magdalena Westergren

Download
… Whether discussing consumer products or organizing political movements, people around the world constantly use social-media platforms to seek and share information. Companies use them to reach consumers in new ways too; by tapping into these conversations, organizations can generate richer insights and create precisely targeted messages and offers.



English: Infographic on how Social Media are b...
English: Infographic on how Social Media are being used, and how everything is changed by them. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
While 72 percent of companies use social technologies in some way, very few are anywhere near to achieving the full potential benefit. In fact, the most powerful applications of social technologies in the global economy are largely untapped. …  [The] McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) finds that twice as much potential value lies in using social tools to enhance communications, knowledge sharing, and collaboration within and across enterprises. MGI’s estimates suggest that by fully implementing social technologies, companies have an opportunity to raise the productivity of interaction workers—high-skill knowledge workers, including managers and professionals—by 20 to 25 percent.

Exhibit

The social economy - Improved communication


Social economy
Social economy (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
MGI’s report, The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies, explores their potential economic impact by examining their current usage and evolving application in four commercial sectors: consumer packaged goods, retail financial services, advanced manufacturing, and professional services. These technologies, which create value by improving productivity across the value chain, could potentially contribute $900 billion to $1.3 trillion in annual value across the four sectors.

Two-thirds of this potential value lies in improving collaboration and communication within and across enterprises. …[When] companies use social media internally, messages become content; a searchable record of knowledge can reduce, by as much as 35 percent, the time employees spend searching for company information. Additional value can be realized through faster, more efficient, more effective collaboration, both within and between enterprises.

The amount of value individual companies can capture from social technologies varies widely by industry, as do the sources of value. Companies that have a high proportion of interaction workers can realize tremendous productivity improvements through faster internal communication and smoother collaboration. Companies that depend very heavily on influencing consumers can derive considerable value by interacting with them in social media and by monitoring the conversations to gain a richer perspective on product requirements or brand image—for much less than what traditional research methods would cost.

To reap the full benefit of social technologies, organizations must transform their structures, processes, and cultures: they will need to become more open and nonhierarchical and to create a culture of trust. Ultimately, the power of social technologies hinges on the full and enthusiastic participation of employees who are not afraid to share their thoughts and trust that their contributions will be respected. Creating these conditions will be far more challenging than implementing the technologies themselves.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, July 16, 2012

Five 'no regrets' moves for superior customer engagement

Customers are demanding very different kinds of relationships with companies. Here are some ways to jump-start customer engagement across your organization.

McKinsey Quarterly
JULY 2012 • Tom French, Laura LaBerge, and Paul Magill
Source: Marketing & Sales Practice




five moves for superior customer engagement article, customers now want stronger ties with companies, Marketing & Sales

No organization can avoid coming to grips with the rapidly evolving behavior of consumers and business customers. … As we noted in a McKinsey Quarterly article last year, these changes present significant organizational challenges, as well as opportunities. The biggest is that all of us have become marketers: the critical moments of interaction, or touch points, between companies and customers are increasingly spread across different parts of the organization, so customer engagement is now everyone’s responsibility.1


In many companies, the marketing function is best placed to orchestrate customer engagement for the entire organization. To do so, the function must be pervasive—able to influence touch points it doesn’t directly control. … The spectrum of organizational choices is broader than ever, and companies are struggling to determine the appropriate role of marketing for their business. … Given the absence of solid return-on-investment data (see “Measuring marketing’s worth”), [senior executives] may express skepticism about marketing’s place in the new environment.

Although these challenges are difficult to overcome, companies need not be frozen in place while they wait for a complete picture of the answer to emerge. The five “no regrets” moves described below help senior executives to move beyond their function-by-function view of customer engagement and to improve the coordination of activities across the broad range of touch points they must care about. By widening the lens companies use to view customer-engagement needs, enabling more rapid responses, and building internal lines of communication, these steps create nimbler organizations with more pervasive marketing.
1. Hold a customer-engagement summit


Social Media Customer Engagement, Customer Loy...
Social Media Customer Engagement, Customer Loyalty Panel (Photo credit: BenSpark)
Almost all companies have annual or semi-annual business-planning processes that bring senior managers together from units and functions to discuss strategies and objectives. Yet few undertake a similar process to discuss how to engage with the lifeblood of all companies: customers. We recommend holding such a summit, with a participant list that starts right at the top and cuts across units and functions. …

The focus of such a summit is customer engagement, …; engagement goes beyond managing the experience at touch points to include all the ways companies motivate customers to invest in an ongoing relationship with a product or brand. The summit must address three things. First, line and staff managers have to align on the vision for engagement: what relationship do you want with your customers? … After Starbucks investigated customer engagement in France and Italy, for example, it concluded that consumers in those countries preferred traditional local café formats. As a result, it invested in distinctive store layouts and furnishings and adjusted its beverages and service techniques.2



English: A business ideally is continually see...
English: A business ideally is continually seeking feedback from customers: are the products helpful? are their needs being met? Constructive criticism helps marketers adjust offerings to meet customer needs. Source of diagram: here (see public domain declaration at top). Questions: write me at my Wikipedia talk page (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Second, the summit’s participants should coordinate the activities required to reach and engage customers across the full range of touch points. … A customer-engagement summit allows the senior-management team to create a coordinated plan spanning them—so that, for example, the customer experience in a call center can be coordinated with the behavior of frontline employees, or the online-registration experience with product development.

Finally, a company ought to agree on the elements of the customer-engagement ecosystem that should be undertaken in-house and those that will involve outside partners. Internal resources probably won’t be able to deliver all of the requirements imposed by … many touch points: for instance, content and communications; data analytics and insights; product and service innovation; customer experience design and delivery; and managing brand, reputation, and corporate citizenship. Senior leaders need to decide how to carry out these activities and design the mix of in-house capabilities and external partners that will deliver them. These customer-engagement planning sessions, in addition to informing and motivating the organization as a whole around customer engagement, can help avoid spreading scarce resources too thinly.
2. Create a customer-engagement council


… [Your] customer-engagement council may already exist under another name, such as the strategic-planning or brand council. The purpose is to bring together all primary forms of engagement— marketing, communications, service, sales, product management, and so on—to coordinate tactics across touch points in a more timely manner.

This council, which should be an operational and decision-making body, must translate the findings of the customer-engagement summit into specific actions at individual touch points. To accomplish this goal, the council’s membership needs to be large enough to ensure that all key players are represented but small enough to make decisions efficiently. … These councils are most effective when chaired by the same person who leads the customer-engagement summit, such as the CMO or the head of communications, strategy, sales, or service.

The second consideration is how regularly the council should meet. … The frequency of such meetings generally is based on what key engagement activities the group is driving and their cycle time. The third consideration involves inputs and support: the council must make fact-based decisions, so it needs information on everything from priority touch points to customer behavior and the moves of competitors.

Finally, such a council must have a customer-engagement charter. To reduce the risk of gaps, rework, and turf wars, everyone in the organization needs clarity about decision rights over touch points and the key processes that affect them. As we explained last year, it’s useful to allocate the design, build, operate, and renew rights for specific touch points explicitly to functional “owners.” Marketing, for example, might design and renew scripts for a call center, which sales or operations would build and operate. In addition, the process of developing a charter is useful to force a dialogue about who owns and does what. More specifically, what does marketing do in customer engagement? What does it not do?

When conceived, constructed, and operated correctly, these customer-engagement councils play a critical role in breaking the “silo” mind-set that diminishes the effectiveness of customer engagement in many organizations. Such a council often serves as a mediator and decision maker in conflicts between functions and business units and as a filter for what must be elevated to the level of the CEO or other senior leaders.
3. Appoint a ‘chief content officer’
… It’s now evident that the challenge is not just understanding digital channels but also coping with the volume, nature, and velocity of the content needed to use them effectively. Companies need to create a supply chain of increasingly sophisticated and interactive content to feed consumer demand for information and engagement, not to mention a mechanism for managing the content consumers themselves generate. The emergence of companies-as-publishers demands the appointment of a chief content officer (CCO).

Companies across industries—from luxury goods to retailing, financial services, automotive, and even professional sports—are creating versions of this role. All are adopting a journalistic approach to recognize hot issues and shaping emerging sentiment by delivering compelling content that forges stronger emotional bonds with consumers. The CCO role is designed to provide the on-brand, topical, and provocative content needed to engage customers. The CCO must develop and manage all aspects of the supply chain for content, ranging from deciding where and how it’s sourced to overseeing the external agencies and in-house creative talent generating it.

Companies shouldn’t forget that even with a CCO in place, designing and executing a content strategy still requires coordination with several key business areas. The group responsible for gathering and analyzing customer insights, for example, may need a new mandate to support the CCO by providing research on what customers and segments require, as well as where, when, and how that content can most effectively be delivered. The CCO may need help from human resources to find, attract, manage, motivate, and develop the in-house creative talent often required to fulfill a content vision. The CCO will have to work closely with the team responsible for shaping brand perceptions to understand the company’s character deeply—its heritage, purpose, and values—and with areas such as corporate social responsibility, investor relations, and government affairs to gain a full perspective on how the company interacts with external stakeholders.
4. Create a ‘listening center’
… In this environment, companies should establish listening centers that monitor what is being said about their organizations, products, and services on social media, blogs, and other online forums.3
Such monitoring should be hardwired into the business to shorten response times during real and potential crises, complement internal metrics and traditional tracking research on brand performance, feed consumer feedback into the product-development process, and serve as a platform for testing customer reactions. … A French telecommunications company not only monitors online activity but also has a tool kit of prepared responses. “I can’t predict what crisis will hit,” a senior executive at the company said. “But depending on the magnitude of it, I know the people I need to get in the room and what to discuss.”
5. Challenge your total customer-engagement budget
Many companies struggle to figure out how they can afford all the new tactics, vehicles, and content types required to engage with customers effectively. We propose a different mind-set: recognizing that there’s plenty of money, but in the wrong places. Companies can now communicate with customers much more productively: digital and social channels, for example, are radically cheaper (and sometimes more effective) than traditional media communications or face-to-face sales visits. When you make trade-offs across functions, you can free large amounts of money to invest elsewhere; if the experience of customers is so positive that they voluntarily serve as advocates for your brand, for example, can you reduce advertising expenditures? The moves your customer service center makes to resolve a crisis—say, a lost credit card on a honeymoon or a major machine failure on a critical production run—may build more lifetime loyalty than years of traditional loyalty campaigns.

What prevents many companies from realizing these productivity gains and cross-function trade-offs is a failure to look at total spending on customer engagement. They don’t see the opportunities to make trade-offs across functions and optimize the impact of investments across the entire set of touch points. Most budget on a function-by-function basis, and measure impact the same way. When you look at these expenditures and investments that way, there is almost never enough money, because each function seeks increased funding to improve the customer interactions for which it is accountable. That’s a losing game.

Instead, add up what you spend on customer engagement—in areas such as sales, service, operations, and product management, as well as in marketing. Then identify all the radically cheaper approaches you could take and ask, for example, how you would take them if your budget was 15 percent of its current size or how a competitor in an emerging market would approach this problem. Such exercises help to break the ingrained assumptions and conventional wisdom that creep into organizations and to highlight overlooked opportunities.

Finally, look at trade-offs across functions—for example, among investments in store renovations, revamped e-commerce sites, higher ad spending, changes in your model of sales force coverage, or improved operations in customer service centers. Which of these should be prioritized and in what order? Such decisions should be made not just on the projected financial returns but also on a strategic assessment of how customer expectations are evolving, how competitors are changing their methods of customer engagement, and where your company may have distinctive capabilities that could help it win through superior customer engagement.

One major Asian retailer did exactly this. Faced with ever-rising costs, it looked at its entire customer-engagement budget and identified where it was underperforming or missing out on new approaches to engagement. With that baseline, it cut 25 percent off its traditional marketing budget, invested in customer service, and reallocated other marketing expenditures to focus on digital, social, and mobile channels. By reducing in-store operations costs, the retailer financed new investments in a major loyalty program to improve its engagement with customers. As a result, 70 percent of the company’s sales now are to members of its loyalty program—about three times the rate of its competitors. Total costs are lower and margins higher, despite a challenging retail environment.

More customer interactions across more touch points are shaping the degree of engagement a customer feels with your company. The critical barrier to harnessing the potential value in this shift is organizational—companies that learn to design and execute effective customer-engagement strategies will have the advantage; the others will lose ground. We have no doubt that companies will one day evolve the full set of processes and structures needed to manage customer engagement across the whole organization. Until then, these five steps can get you moving in the right direction.


About the Authors
Tom French is a director in McKinsey’s Boston office; Laura LaBerge and Paul Magill are senior experts in the Stamford office.
Notes
1 See Tom French, Laura LaBerge, and Paul Magill, “We’re all marketers now,” mckinseyquarterly.com, July 2011.
2 See Liz Alderman, “In Europe, Starbucks adjusts to a café culture,” New York Times, March 30, 2012.
3 For more about the importance of monitoring social networks and responding to consumers, see Roxane Divol, David Edelman, and Hugo Sarrazin, “Demystifying social media,” mckinseyquarterly.com, April 2012. For some real-life examples of how companies are using social media to drive engagement, see “How we see it: Three senior executives on the future of marketing,” mckinseyquarterly.com, July 2011.
Enhanced by Zemanta